Three Schools of Thought on Enterprise Architecture

Three schools of thought on enterprise architecture exist, each with its own belief system (definitions, concerns, assumptions, and limitations). A novel taxonomy of these schools creates a starting point for resolving terminological challenges to help establish enterprise architecture as a discipline.

Scope & purpose:

Screen Shot 2016-01-15 at 2.24.49 PM

Brief comparison among schools of thought:

Screen Shot 2016-01-15 at 2.24.39 PM

Authors:

Screen Shot 2016-01-15 at 2.25.09 PM

If organisations are to survive the turbulence of today’s markets, they must learn to adapt and innovate. A survey by the Gartner and Forrester technology market consulting firms shows that current enterprise architecture practices, which are mostly based on the enterprise IT architecture school of thought, aren’t doing very well—they lack acceptance and are perceived as organisationally inconsiderate. It is recommended that the enterprises should have to move to more holistic ways of thinking if they wish to survive and flourish.

Source: James Lapalme, Three Schools of Thought on Enterprise Architecture, IT Professional Nov/Dec 2012.

Advertisements

Enterprise Architecture

Enterprise Architecture Framework is a set of assumptions, concepts, values, and practices that constitutes a way of looking at enterprise reality via views on (architecture) models. It offers a fundamental structure, serving as a scaffold for developing, maintaining, and using EA.

Zachman Framework

Zachman visualises the entire enterprise at one glance. All aspects are treated as equally important; should be described as simple, basic model.

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.05.55 AM

TOGAF

The Open Group Architecture Framework (TOGAF) is a generic yet comprehensive methodological framework for developing enterprise architecture.

TOGAF Architecture Development Methodology (ADM)

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.06.35 AM

TOGAF Architecture Content Framework

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.06.56 AM

TOGAF Architecture Capability Framework

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.07.16 AM

Screen Shot 2016-01-13 at 8.07.27 AM

Gartner Methodology

Gartner Methodology essentially stems from the META Group. It does not publish a formal framework or a process to do EA. Instead, its consultants guide enterprises in setting up a process by which EA can emerge from their business strategy.

Source: Stefan Bente et. al., Collaborative Enterprise Architecture, Morgan Kaufmann, Elsevier 2012. ISBN 9780124159341.

Enterprise SOA for Big Data Service

Introduction to ESARC:

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 1.01.33 PM

ESARC Business & Information Reference architecture:

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 1.01.47 PM

ESARC Business & Information Reference architecture metamodel:

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 1.01.58 PM

ESARC Information Systems Reference architecture:

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 1.02.05 PM

Source: Alfred Zimmermann et al, Towards Service-oriented Enterprise Architectures for Big Data Applications in the Cloud, IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference Workshops, 2013.

Cloud-Based Enterprise IT

Trends:

  • Cloud
  • IT commercialisation
  • Cross-enterprise collaboration

IT as Enterprise Integrator

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 8.14.37 AM

Service-centric IT Ecosystem

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 8.17.10 AM

Hybrid IT Portfolio

Screen Shot 2016-01-12 at 8.18.43 AM

Five-phase approach (adapting ITIL methodology):

  1. Strategy: Our approach starts by identifying business needs and then defines the service capabilities and parameters necessary to support the business.
  2. Design: The enterprise identifies the necessary services and selects potential service providers. This process includes conventionally provided in-house services, but mainly focuses on external service providers.
  3. Implementation: In service-based IT, implementation includes negotiating and contracting for services, followed by assembly (or integration) of those services.
  4. Operation: The ongoing maintenance of business and technical relationships with service providers helps account for changes in the business and technology landscapes.
  5. Continuous improvement: The final phase is an ongoing effort to manage relationships with service providers to maximize business benefit. Efforts in this phase include assessing risks and devising mitigation strategies to protect against service disruptions or failures.

Source: Jamie Erbes et al, The Future of Enterprise IT in the Cloud, IEEE Computer, May 2012.